Why cross+1 instead of just cross?

At a high level, cross+first pair becomes one step rather than two, so counting cross+1 as a step/stat instead of cross by itself is more accurate.



Where did the ~50 smartcube reconstructions go?

Due to CubeStation's questionable degree of scramble randomness, as well as the fundemental issue that smartcube times differ too heavily from
keyboard/stackmat solve times anyway, smartcube reconstructions were removed.



Any plans for other event reconstructions being added?

While reconstructions and statistics for any puzzle would prove useful for analysis, short one-look puzzles like 2x2, pyraminx, and skewb can't
properly display what's really behind each solution; on paper, the solutions are very short and almost full algorithmic, and without the solver
themselves explaining their thought process, there is very little to be gained from any solution or stat.