At a high level, cross+first pair becomes one step rather than two, so counting cross+1 as a step/stat instead of cross by itself is more accurate.
Due to CubeStation's questionable degree of scramble randomness, as well as the fundamental issue that smartcube times differ too heavily from
keyboard/stackmat solve times anyway, smartcube reconstructions were removed.
While reconstructions and statistics for any puzzle would prove useful for analysis, short one-look puzzles like 2x2, pyraminx, and skewb can't
properly display what's really behind each solution; on paper, the solutions are very short and almost fully algorithmic, and without the solver
themselves explaining their thought process, there is very little to be gained from any solution or statistic.
Subject to change at any point in time? Probably.
